Skip to content
SizingKit

Electrical · wye, delta and the √3

Three Phase Power Calculator

Free calculator for a balanced three-phase load in either connection: enter a line-to-line voltage and a line current and it returns the winding voltage and current, the total in kW, kVA and kVAR, and the per-phase figure that carries no √3 at all. No signup. It also works backwards from a plate rating — kW, kVA, or horsepower read out of NEC Table 430.250, which prints as a chart — and checks whether the supply is balanced enough for any of it to apply.

  • 100% free
  • No signup
  • Wye and delta
  • √3 = 1.7320508
  • NEC 430.250 printable

Balanced three-phase, wye or delta

Enter what you measured at the lines, or what is stamped on the plate. Every figure below assumes the three phases carry equal current at equal voltage; the check at the foot of the page says whether they do.

Default 0.80ISO 8528-1 rates reciprocating engine driven generating sets at 0.8 lagging power factor for three-phase sets, which is why a set badged 100 kW is badged 125 kVA on the same plate.

Line and phase quantities, and the total

Total real power

41.2 kW

55.3 hp

Total apparent power

51.5 kVA

30.93 kVAR

Per phase, real

13.7 kW

one third of the total

In a wye the three windings meet at a common point, so each one sees the voltage between a line and that point. The line-to-line voltage is √3 times it — 480 V across the lines is 277 V to neutral — while the current has nowhere else to go, so line current and winding current are the same figure. Either way the total is √3 × V(line) × I(line) × PF, with √3 taken as 1.7320508 from the engine rather than typed here, and the per-phase figure is V(phase) × I(phase) × PF with no √3 in it. Multiply that per-phase figure by three and the total comes back — which is the check that the radical is a consequence of measuring at the lines rather than an extra term in the physics.

Is it actually balanced?

Everything above assumes three equal voltages. Take all three line-to-line readings at the same terminals and this says how far apart they are, by the definition NEMA uses.

NEMA MG 1 defines percent voltage unbalance as 100 × the greatest deviation of any one line voltage from the average of the three, divided by that average, and calls for a polyphase motor to be derated once the unbalance passes 1 %. The derating factor that applies above the threshold is a curve in NEMA MG 1 and this site does not reproduce it. Read it from the standard, or from the motor manufacturer's own guidance. What is worth knowing without the curve is the direction of the effect: a small voltage unbalance produces a much larger current unbalance in an induction motor — a rule of thumb of six to ten times is common in the trade and is not a published figure — and the extra heating lands in one winding rather than being shared.

How to get a three-phase result without doubling or halving it

Two questions decide every figure on this page: which connection the windings are in, and whether the number you are holding was measured at the lines or inside them.

  1. Name the connection before you name the numbers

    A wye has a fourth point where the three windings meet, so a voltage to that point exists and is smaller than the one between lines. A delta has no such point, so the winding sees the whole line voltage and the split lands on the current instead. Choosing wrong swaps which quantity gets divided and puts the answer out by 73 % in one direction or 42 % in the other.

  2. Enter a line-to-line voltage and a line current

    These are the two quantities you can actually measure without opening a machine: a meter across any two of the three lines, and a clamp round any one of them. On a 480Y/277 V system the line-to-line figure is the 480, not the 277, and putting the 277 in is the single most common way this calculation goes wrong.

  3. Take the total from the line figures and the check from the phase ones

    The total is √3 × line volts × line amps × power factor. The per-phase figure is winding volts × winding amps × power factor with no radical in it, and three of those equals the total — a check you can do in your head that catches a misplaced √3 immediately. Below the result, three line-to-line readings tell you whether the balanced assumption behind both is still holding.

What this page computes, and what it will not

The factor√3 = 1.7320508075688772, taken from the engine's own constant rather than typed on the page, and applied only between a line quantity and a per-phase one.
ConnectionsWye and delta. In wye the line-to-line voltage is √3 × the line-to-neutral voltage and the two currents are equal; in delta the winding voltage is the line voltage and the line current is √3 × the winding current.
Starting pointsA measured line voltage with a line current, or a plate rating in W, kW, MW, VA, kVA, MVA or motor horsepower.
Motor tableNEC (NFPA 70) 2023 Table 430.250, 27 horsepower ratings against 6 voltage columns, rendered as a printable chart. Two cells — 40 hp and 350 hp at 575 V — are left blank because this site could not confirm them twice over.
Power factor0.80 prefilled, the rating convention ISO 8528-1 uses for three-phase generating sets, editable from 0.01 to 1.00 — and not used at all for the apparent-power result, which needs no power factor by definition.
Balance checkPercent voltage unbalance from three line-to-line readings by the NEMA MG 1 definition, against its 1 % threshold. The derating curve that applies above that threshold lives in MG 1 and is not reproduced here.
ScopeBalanced loads only. No unbalanced phase currents, no symmetrical components, no harmonic content, and no fault current.
Units reportedReal power in kW and hp together, apparent power in kVA, reactive power in kVAR to two decimals, and both voltages and both currents in the SI prefixes their instruments read in.

Frequently asked questions

Is 208 V between two legs the same as 208 V three-phase?

The voltage is the same but the load is not, and that difference is worth several thousand watts. A single-phase 208 V load connected across two of the three lines draws current in one pair of conductors and its power is simply volts times amps times power factor. A three-phase 208 V load uses all three, and its power is √3 times larger for the same current in each line. A shop heater sold as 208 V single-phase and one sold as 208 V three-phase have the same nameplate voltage and completely different breakers.

Where does √3 actually come from?

From the 120° between the phases, through a piece of trigonometry you can do on paper. Two line-to-neutral voltages of equal size separated by 120° subtract to give the line-to-line voltage, and the magnitude of that difference is 2 × sin 60°, which is √3. Everything else follows: 277 V × 1.732 is 480 V, 120 V × 1.732 is 208 V, and the 240 V delta with a center-tapped winding produces its notorious high leg at 208 V to neutral for exactly the same reason. It is a consequence of measuring between two rotating vectors rather than an extra term in the physics.

Does a motor nameplate give line current or winding current?

Line current, always — it is what the conductor feeding the motor carries and what the overload device sees. The winding current inside a delta-connected motor is smaller by √3 and is not a figure you can measure without opening the machine, which is why no plate states it. This matters on a wye-delta starter, where the motor runs delta and starts wye, and the starting current is a third of what the same motor would pull thrown straight across the line.

Why is the 460 V column of the motor table exactly half the 230 V column?

Because doubling the voltage of the same motor halves its current at the same output power, and no √3 enters that ratio — both columns are three-phase, so the factor is already in both and cancels. The same arithmetic sets the rest of the table: the 200 V column is 1.15 times the 230 V one, the 208 V column 1.10 times, and the 575 V column 0.8 times the 460 V. Those four relations hold across every filled cell of the table, which is how the transcription behind this chart was verified rather than trusted.

Why is my neutral hotter than the phase conductors on a balanced panel?

Third-harmonic current, which adds in the neutral instead of canceling there. On a balanced linear wye load the three fundamental currents are 120° apart and sum to zero at the neutral, which is the whole reason a neutral can be sized smaller in some systems. The third harmonic of each phase, however, lands in phase with the other two, so three equal harmonic currents arrive at the neutral and add arithmetically. A panel full of switch-mode supplies, LED drivers and single-phase electronic loads can put more current in the neutral than in any phase. This page does not compute it: measuring with a true-RMS clamp on the neutral itself is the only honest way to know.

Can I use this for a single-phase load fed from a three-phase panel?

No, and doing it anyway inflates the answer by 73 %. A load between two lines of a three-phase system is a single-phase load: it has one voltage, one current and no √3 in its power. Use the single-phase arithmetic instead, and note that its current returns on the second line rather than on a neutral, so a 208 V two-pole circuit loads two phases of the panel and not one.

Why does the page refuse 40 hp and 350 hp at 575 V?

Because those two cells of Table 430.250 could not be confirmed against the ratio the rest of the 575 V column obeys, and an interpolated one would look exactly as convincing as a correct one. Every other figure in the chart was verified twice, against a neighboring column and against the column's own ratio. Two of them were not, so they are blank and the page says to read them from the code book — that current sizes a conductor, a disconnect and a short-circuit protective device, and a plausible wrong number there is worse than no number.

About wye, delta and where the √3 belongs

Three windings can be joined two ways and the choice decides which quantity gets divided. Join one end of each to a common point and you have a wye: each winding sits between a line and that center, so a fourth conductor can be brought out from it, and the voltage between any two lines is √3 times the voltage from either to the center. That is where 480Y/277 and 208Y/120 come from — one system, two voltages, both true at once. Join them end to end in a triangle instead and you have a delta: each winding is strung directly between two lines and sees the full line voltage, so there is no center to bring out and the √3 moves onto the current, with each line feeding two windings and the winding carrying the line current divided by the same factor. The 240 V delta with one winding center-tapped is the awkward hybrid that has both, and the conductor from that tap to the third line sits at 208 V above ground rather than 120 — the high leg that NEC 110.15 requires to be marked orange, and a genuinely dangerous place to land a 120 V circuit.

The identity itself is short: total power is √3 × line volts × line amps × power factor, and per-winding power is winding volts × winding amps × power factor with no radical anywhere in it. Both are correct, three of the second equals the first in either connection, and holding that in mind is the whole defense against the classic error of applying the factor twice or leaving it out. Horsepower is the one input on this page that is not arithmetic at all. It is a mechanical output, so converting it to amperes needs the motor’s own efficiency and its own power factor, neither of which is a table anyone can publish — the code sidesteps that by publishing the current directly in Table 430.250 and requiring, under 430.6(A)(1), that the table figure rather than the nameplate be used for sizing conductors, switches and short-circuit protection. The nameplate governs the running overload device and nothing else. The table values are deliberately conservative and sit above what a modern high-efficiency motor really draws, so the substitution people make in good faith undersizes the wire.

Everything here assumes the three phases are equal, which is why the balance check sits under the result rather than at the end of an article: NEMA’s definition needs three readings you can take with the meter already in your hand, and past its threshold the identities above have stopped describing the machine. Where the source is a transformer rather than a measurement, the kVA to amps calculator takes the same √3 from the apparent-power side, where no power factor is involved at all. The single-phase version of the power arithmetic, with the triangle drawn and the reactive term named, is the volts, amps and watts calculator; the direct-current case with no angle in it is the Ohm’s law calculator; and the electrical calculator runs this relation alongside the other four with the substituted numbers printed. One further tail worth knowing: correcting a three-phase power factor usually means a delta-connected capacitor bank, and NEC 460.6 requires the residual voltage on those capacitors to be brought down to 50 V or less after disconnection — a minute for units rated 1,000 V and below. The bleed path that does it is an ordinary RC discharge, and how long it takes is the RC time constant calculator.

Where the site readings you type end up

Every number on this page is worked out by JavaScript running in the tab you are reading it in. Nothing you type — loads, lengths, nameplate ratings, the rates your utility charges you — is uploaded, logged or kept, which is also why the calculators carry on working in a mechanical room with no signal.

The three line voltages of the balance check are the most site-specific figures on this page and they are treated like the rest: parsed in the tab, used to draw one percentage, and discarded when you navigate away. There is no account, so there is nowhere for a record of a customer’s switchgear to accumulate.