Reactive power
Power Factor Calculator
Enter any two of real power, apparent power and power factor — or volts, amps and what the meter says — and this returns the third along with the reactive power in kVAR. It then sizes the correction: the kVAR to reach your target, the microfarads per leg for a delta or wye bank at 50 or 60 Hz, and how much of that correction your tariff threshold actually pays for.
- 100% free
- No signup
- kVAR and µF
- Delta and wye
- 70-cell printable chart
The operating point you have
Any two of the three powers fix the third, because they are the sides of a right triangle. Enter the two you actually have in front of you.
Line to line on three-phase. The capacitance below cannot be worked out without it, so this field stays whichever pair you pick.
One leg of a balanced load. An unbalanced service has three answers and this has one.
Taken as lagging, which an induction motor, a ballast and a welder all are.
The three powers as they stand
Real power
78.5 kW
105 hp
Apparent power
101 kVA
100,598 VA
Reactive power
63 kVAR
0.78 PF · 38.7° lagging
The conductors and the supply transformer are carrying 121 A whether or not all of it does work.
Two sides fix the third: S² = P² + Q², with PF = P ÷ S. On the three-phase setting the identity pairs line-to-line volts with line current across a √3; on single-phase it carries no factor at all, which is where it parts company with voltage drop, where a single-phase run counts the conductor out and back and doubles instead. What comes back is displacement power factor, the cosine of the angle between voltage and current at the line frequency; a true-RMS meter on a rectifier load reads something lower that capacitance does not fix.
What you are correcting to
Two power factors decide the spend, and they are rarely the same one: the figure the tariff stops charging at, and the figure you want the plant to run at.
Default 0.95. Correcting to unity leaves no margin before a light-load hour tips the plant leading.
Default 0.95 — The rate schedule your utility filed with its regulator — the line marked 'power factor adjustment', 'reactive demand' or 'kVA demand' on your own bill. No code or standard fixes this figure.
The kVAR is the same either way. The microfarads are not: wye needs three times delta.
A bank marked for 60 Hz delivers five-sixths of its kVAR on a 50 Hz supply.
The correction and what it buys
Correction needed
37.2 kVAR
37,161 var
Capacitance across the line
143 µF
each of 3, 480 V, 60 Hz
Apparent power after
82.6 kVA
18 kVA released
Line current after
99.3 A
from 121 A
Losses upstream
−32.6%
in your own conductors, not the utility’s
Target and threshold are the same figure, so one bank does both jobs and no part of the spend goes unrepaid by the tariff.
The bank itself draws 44.7 A, and NEC 460.8(A) wants its conductors at 1.35× that — 60.3 A of ampacity, not the bank current.
Capacitance comes out of Q = 2πf C V² at the voltage each unit actually stands across, which is why the kVAR is connection-independent and the microfarads are not. NEC (NFPA 70) 2023, 460.8(A): the ampacity of capacitor circuit conductors shall not be less than 135 percent of the rated current of the capacitor. None of this decides whether a bank belongs on your system: put capacitance on a service that also feeds variable-frequency drives and the bank and the supply transformer can resonate at a harmonic, which is a study with a meter on the line rather than a step in an arithmetic sequence.
kVAR per kW, from where you are to where you want to be
Multiply your real power in kilowatts by the figure in the cell. A 200 kW load at 0.75 taken to 0.95 needs 200 × 0.553, or 111 kVAR.
| Present PF | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.50 | 1.248 | 1.306 | 1.403 | 1.529 | 1.732 |
| 0.55 | 1.034 | 1.092 | 1.190 | 1.315 | 1.518 |
| 0.60 | 0.849 | 0.907 | 1.005 | 1.130 | 1.333 |
| 0.65 | 0.685 | 0.743 | 0.840 | 0.966 | 1.169 |
| 0.70 | 0.536 | 0.594 | 0.692 | 0.817 | 1.020 |
| 0.72 | 0.480 | 0.538 | 0.635 | 0.761 | 0.964 |
| 0.75 | 0.398 | 0.456 | 0.553 | 0.679 | 0.882 |
| 0.78 | 0.318 | 0.376 | 0.474 | 0.599 | 0.802 |
| 0.80 | 0.266 | 0.324 | 0.421 | 0.547 | 0.750 |
| 0.82 | 0.214 | 0.272 | 0.369 | 0.495 | 0.698 |
| 0.85 | 0.135 | 0.194 | 0.291 | 0.417 | 0.620 |
| 0.88 | 0.055 | 0.114 | 0.211 | 0.337 | 0.540 |
| 0.90 | — | 0.058 | 0.156 | 0.281 | 0.484 |
| 0.92 | — | — | 0.097 | 0.223 | 0.426 |
Every cell is tan(arccos PF₁) − tan(arccos PF₂), computed when the page renders rather than copied out of a capacitor catalog. Unity is in the last column because it is the arithmetic ceiling, not because reaching for it is a good idea.
How to size a power factor correction bank
Three steps, and the second is the one most calculators skip.
Put in the operating point you actually measured
A clamp meter and a voltmeter at the switchboard give you volts and amps; the power factor comes off the utility meter, the demand meter or a power quality logger. If instead you have a kW figure from a bill and a kVA figure from the transformer, pick that pair and the power factor falls out of the ratio.
Set the target and the tariff threshold separately
The target is where you want the plant to run. The threshold is the power factor your utility's rate schedule stops charging below, and it is a different number written on a different piece of paper. Entering both makes the page tell you which one is spending your money.
Read the kVAR, then the capacitance for the bank you will order
The kVAR figure is what you quote to a supplier and is the same whether the units are connected in delta or in wye. Switch the connection selector to see the microfarads per leg change by a factor of three, and check the 135 percent conductor current before anyone runs cable to it.
Technical specifications
| Ways in | Four: volts, amps and a metered power factor; kW and power factor; kVA and power factor; or kW and kVA together, which solves for the power factor instead of taking it. |
|---|---|
| Units on the power fields | Real power takes W, kW, MW, hp, BTU/h, MBH and refrigeration tons. Apparent power takes VA, kVA and MVA and refuses kW — the two are separate quantities and crossing them is what undersizes equipment. |
| Power factor range | 0.01 to 1.00, taken as lagging. A load already above the target returns zero kVAR rather than a negative bank, because a negative capacitor is an inductor and nobody buys one for this. |
| Correction | Qc = P × (tan φ₁ − tan φ₂), evaluated in var and reported in both var and kVAR. |
| Capacitance | C = Q ÷ (2πf V²) per leg at 50 or 60 Hz, taking line-to-line volts for a delta bank and line-to-line ÷ √3 for a wye bank. The kVAR is the same either way; the microfarads differ by three times. |
| Printed chart | 70 multipliers — 14 present power factors from 0.50 to 0.92 against 5 targets from 0.90 to unity — generated from tan(arccos PF) at render time, not transcribed. |
| Code reference printed with the answer | NEC 460.8(A): capacitor circuit conductors at not less than 135 percent of the capacitor's rated current. |
| Where the arithmetic happens | In this browser tab. Nothing about your plant, your tariff or your loads is sent anywhere, so the page works on a laptop plugged into a switchgear room with no signal. |
Frequently asked questions
Will correcting power factor lower my electricity bill?
Only the parts of the bill that are billed on kVA or carry a power factor adjustment — the kilowatt-hour line does not move at all. The energy meter registers real power, and capacitors change reactive power, not real power. What they do change is current, and therefore the demand a kVA meter records and the I²R heating in the conductors on your side of the meter. On a rate schedule with no reactive term whatsoever, the entire return is that loss reduction inside your own building, and on a short feeder run it is usually far too small to repay a bank.
Can you overcorrect, and what goes wrong if you do?
Yes, and past unity the current starts climbing again — leading this time instead of lagging. A demand meter that bills in kVA charges a leading 0.90 exactly as it charges a lagging 0.90, so the money runs back out the other side. The more expensive failure is self-excitation: a capacitor left connected to an induction motor that has just been switched off feeds it magnetizing current while it coasts, and the motor acts briefly as a generator, producing voltages high enough to damage the winding and to reclose onto out-of-phase. That is why an individual capacitor is switched by the motor's own contactor and sized below the motor's no-load magnetizing current, not at the motor's full-load kVAR.
My variable-frequency drive is rated 0.98. Why does adding capacitors make things worse?
Because that 0.98 is displacement power factor and the figure your meter is unhappy about is true power factor. A six-pulse drive front end draws current in narrow pulses twice a cycle: the fundamental component sits almost in phase with the voltage, which is what makes the displacement number look excellent, while the harmonic current in those pulses carries no real power and drags the true power factor down to something far lower. Capacitance corrects only the displacement part, and it simultaneously offers a low-impedance path to the harmonics — the bank and the supply transformer's leakage reactance form a parallel resonant circuit, and if that resonance lands near the 5th or 7th harmonic the capacitor current can rise until fuses clear. A harmonic study, and usually a detuned reactor in series with the bank, is what that plant needs rather than plain capacitance.
Should the capacitors go at the motor or at the main switchboard?
At the motor if you want the current reduction in the feeder that serves it; at the switchboard if all you want is the utility's meter to read better. An individual capacitor at a motor unloads every conductor, contactor and transformer between it and the service, and it switches with the motor so it can never be left connected to a stopped load. A central automatic bank with contactor-switched stages follows a plant load that varies through the day and avoids the self-excitation problem entirely, at the cost of leaving every feeder downstream of it carrying the same current it always did.
Why does the microfarad answer change when I pick wye instead of delta?
Because each capacitor stands across a different voltage, and the reactive power it produces goes as the square of that voltage. In a delta bank every unit sees the full line-to-line voltage; in a wye bank each sees that voltage divided by √3, so a wye bank needs three times the capacitance to make the same kVAR. This is exactly why capacitors are ordered in kVAR at a stated voltage rather than in microfarads: the kVAR is a property of the bank, the microfarads are a property of the connection, and a supplier asked for microfarads has to guess which one you meant.
The utility says my power factor is 0.82 but the meter in my switchboard reads 0.91. Which is right?
Both, usually — they are measuring different things at different places over different windows. A utility power factor is normally derived from the month's registered kVARh against kWh, or from the power factor during the single interval that set your billing demand, so a plant that runs badly for one shift and well for two can bill at a figure it never actually shows on a panel meter. The metering point differs too: the utility measures on the primary side, which includes the magnetizing current of your own service transformer, and that current is reactive, constant, and entirely absent from the reading you take downstream of it.
What power factor costs, and what correcting it actually buys
Power factor is the ratio of real power to apparent power, and every consequence of a poor one comes from the same place: the current. A 100 kW load at 0.75 draws a third more current than the same 100 kW at unity, and that extra current is in the service conductors, the switchgear, the supply transformer and the utility’s distribution plant, doing no work in any of them but heating all of them. That is why the utility bills for it — through a power factor adjustment on demand, or by metering demand in kVA so the reactive part is charged whether or not anybody calls it a penalty — and it is why correction is worth doing on a plant full of lightly loaded induction motors, which is where lagging power factor overwhelmingly comes from. An induction motor at 25 percent load draws nearly its full magnetizing current and almost none of its rated real power, so its power factor collapses while its kVAR stays flat.
The arithmetic of the correction is one line — Qc = P (tan φ₁ − tan φ₂) — and every calculator on the internet gets it right. What most of them leave out is that the number you are correcting to is really two numbers. Your tariff threshold is a figure filed with a regulator; your target is an engineering choice about how much capacity you want back and how much margin you want before a night-shift light load pushes the plant leading. When the target is higher than the threshold, the kVAR between them earns released capacity and lower losses but nothing on the invoice, and knowing which of those two the extra spend is buying is the difference between a payback calculation and a guess. The released capacity is real, though: the kVA figure that disappears when you correct is the kVA a transformer size calculator would have had to carry, which is how a correction sometimes defers a service upgrade outright.
Two things this page deliberately does not do. It does not size a conductor or a transformer from the corrected current, because those decisions weigh limits — ampacity, termination temperature, voltage drop — that the power triangle knows nothing about; a service load calculation and a kW to amps conversion are where those start. And it does not tell you that a bank is safe to install. Adding capacitance to a service that also carries rectifier loads changes the impedance the harmonics see, and the result can be a resonance that puts more current through the capacitors than they are rated for. Everything here is displacement power factor arithmetic; whether your site needs a detuned bank, an active filter or nothing at all is a measurement question, decided with a logger on the line and signed off by an engineer.
Where your tariff figures go
Every number on this page is worked out by JavaScript running in the tab you are reading it in. Nothing you type — loads, lengths, nameplate ratings, the rates your utility charges you — is uploaded, logged or kept, which is also why the calculators carry on working in a mechanical room with no signal.
That matters more here than on a conversion page, because the numbers you type describe your plant: what it draws, when it peaks, and what your utility charges you for it. The page never sees a network to send them to. If you want the figures out, the copy button puts them on your clipboard and nowhere else — and see the watts to amps calculator if you need to take a nameplate the other way first.